Japan’s political landscape is tilting increasingly rightward under the leadership of Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, presenting new hurdles in its relationship with South Korea. Concerns are rising that this conservative shift might strain historical and territorial disputes, potentially jeopardizing the recent diplomatic efforts between the two nations. Historically, South Korea and Japan have managed their differences by employing a “two-track” approach. This strategy separates sensitive historical disagreements from areas where cooperation is essential, such as security and economic partnerships. However, a recent report by South Korea’s Institute for National Security Strategy indicates that Japan’s political trajectory could destabilize these efforts, hindering bilateral diplomacy.
Tensions between the two countries have been rekindled following visits by Japanese politicians to the Yasukuni Shrine, a site that often stirs historical grievances. Additionally, Japan’s reaffirmation of its claim over Dokdo, an island controlled by South Korea but referred to as Takeshima by Japan, has added to the strain. Prime Minister Takaichi refrained from visiting the shrine on the anniversary of Japan’s World War II surrender on August 15 but did send a ritual offering. This gesture, along with visits by several senior Japanese officials to the shrine, prompted formal protests from South Korea.
Despite these tensions, South Korean President Lee Jae Myung has taken a balanced stance. He has acknowledged the historical grievances that persist between the two nations while underscoring the importance of continued cooperation with Japan. This approach aims to maintain a delicate balance between addressing historical issues and fostering collaboration in areas of mutual interest.
Experts caution that if both countries fail to make substantial progress in resolving disputes regarding historical grievances, territorial claims, and wartime controversies, it could undermine the “two-track” strategy. The success of their diplomatic relationship hinges on achieving concrete outcomes and expanding practical cooperation. Both nations need to ensure that these sensitive issues do not overshadow the broader benefits of their partnership.